Note, however, he's referring to a full migration if things get bad enough on Earth, but his rationale for that statement is focused on the time it would take to get to any exoplanet. While I might agree that a full migration might be more problematic and a more reasonable statement, the reason why is flawed in my view.
Probably what distresses me the most about his statement on traveling to exoplanets is just how many revolutions in science have occurred and what theoretical physics is saying about the possibilities of manipulating space-time to travel to other stellar systems in the galaxy. Also, history has proven naysayers wrong more often than not (just look at this list just for a more popular view).
Don't get me wrong - I think Mayor and Queloz's Nobel was well deserved for the first exoplanet discovery. However, Mayor clearly jumped in the history of science naysayer list of something 'that will never happen' which demonstrates a significant lack of scientific vision.
As Lord Kelvin noted in 1895, "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible" QED.
Probably what distresses me the most about his statement on traveling to exoplanets is just how many revolutions in science have occurred and what theoretical physics is saying about the possibilities of manipulating space-time to travel to other stellar systems in the galaxy. Also, history has proven naysayers wrong more often than not (just look at this list just for a more popular view).
Don't get me wrong - I think Mayor and Queloz's Nobel was well deserved for the first exoplanet discovery. However, Mayor clearly jumped in the history of science naysayer list of something 'that will never happen' which demonstrates a significant lack of scientific vision.
As Lord Kelvin noted in 1895, "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible" QED.
No comments